Skip to main content
Web design and development Sep 2026 · 4 min read

What a Recruitment Agency’s Website Needs to Win Both Clients and Candidates

A recruitment agency’s website has the slightly unusual job of holding two very different readers in mind at once, because on any given afternoon it might be opened by a hiring director weighing up whether you can be trusted with a difficult mandate and, an hour later, by a candidate weighing up whether you can be trusted with their career, and those two people arrive with almost opposite questions. Good web design for recruitment agencies is really the discipline of serving both of them properly without short-changing either, which is why I have come to think of an agency site less as a brochure and more as a building with two front doors that happen to share the same walls, the same brand and the same team behind them.

By Christopher Mollard, J4G Design — Fulham, since 2017. Last updated 03 September 2026.

Serving clients and candidates without losing either

The reason a single generic homepage tends to disappoint everyone is that it ends up answering neither reader clearly, and so the first thing I usually do is give each audience a path of its own within a click of landing. A hiring client is scanning quickly for evidence that you understand their sector and can shortlist without wasting their time, so the specialisms, the industries you know and the seniority you operate at all belong high on the page, and a specific, case-shaped proof point such as placing a head of data for a growing fintech in a matter of weeks will always carry more weight than a line about great service, in the same way that a client logo only really reassures when it happens to be relevant to the visitor’s own world. A candidate, on the other hand, is protecting something far more personal, which is their reputation and their time, and so they need the live roles to be easy to browse and honest about the detail that actually matters to them, whether that is the location, the working pattern or whether a role is retained or contingent, and above all they need to understand what happens after they apply, because the thing candidates complain about most is silence.

Structure that holds both audiences at once

In practice this means splitting the navigation cleanly, so that “for employers” and “for candidates” become two distinct routes, each with its own proof, its own tone and its own natural ending, the employer path leading gently towards a brief or a consultation and the candidate path leading towards a genuine job search and the option to send a speculative CV. What keeps the whole thing from feeling like two microsites bolted together is that both paths share a spine — your brand, your sectors, your people — so that the agency still reads as one confident firm rather than a split personality, and holding that balance of one identity serving two funnels is exactly the kind of problem a considered website design process is built to solve. It is also why I would nearly always build a proper, well-structured job listing template into a site that places any real volume of roles, because a native listing that Google can read and surface in its job results does far more for you than a flat PDF ever could, while a lighter “current mandates” list is often enough for the very senior or retained search where discretion matters more than reach.

Being found in a search-heavy market

Recruitment is, after all, an enormously search-driven business, with candidates searching role-and-location terms and clients searching sector-and-service terms, so a site built around two clear audiences quietly hands you two natural keyword territories to own rather than one muddled one, and getting the technical SEO and the schema right on the jobs template is usually where I find agency sites are leaking visibility without anyone realising. The roles themselves need updating constantly, because nothing erodes a candidate’s trust faster than a page full of positions that have quietly been filled, whereas the underlying structure and the proof points only really need revisiting a couple of times a year as your sectors and placements move on. If you are rethinking how your agency’s site serves both sides of the desk, I would be very happy to talk it through — get in touch.

first call, on the house

Ready to build?

Thirty minutes, no pressure, no sales pitch. A conversation about the opportunity and what a properly built site could do.

Common questions

What people ask before starting.

How much does a website cost?

It depends on the scope, but our builds start at £650 for a landing page and £1,400–£5,866 for a custom website. E-commerce starts at £4,150. For ongoing support, WP Care plans start at £59/month, SEO retainers from £749/month, and our all-in Studio packages from £1,350/month.

However a project is priced, we break it into milestones — each with a fixed price tied to a working deliverable. You never pay 50% of the total cost up front. Instead, you pay 50% of the first milestone to start it. When that milestone is complete, you pay the remaining 50% of it together with the 50% deposit on the next milestone — and that's what unlocks the next phase of work. The pattern continues until the final milestone is delivered, at which point you pay the remaining 50% of it.

The effect: cash flow stays smooth, you always see a working deliverable before paying for the next, and we never carry more than half a milestone of unbilled work.

How long does a project take and what does delivery look like?

Indicative timings:

  • Landing page: ~4 weeks from kick-off
  • Custom website: 4–8 weeks
  • E-commerce build: 8–12 weeks
  • Brand work: 2–8 weeks depending on tier

Delivery is broken into milestones built around working functionality, not internal phases like “design” or “build” in isolation. Think of it like an MVP and then MVP+1, MVP+2 — at the end of every milestone you have a live, usable thing you can see and sign off on.

For a typical website project, the milestones look something like this:

  1. MVP — A working homepage and core navigation on staging, with your brand applied. Real, clickable, mobile-friendly.
  2. MVP+1 — All inner pages built, forms wired, analytics installed.
  3. MVP+2 — SEO foundations, schema, performance optimisations, content polish.
  4. Launch — Final QA, DNS cutover, hand-over docs.

You'll always know what we're working on each week and what's due back from you. We never start the next milestone until the previous one is signed off and paid for, which keeps surprises out of the project.

What if I need a bit of everything — can you do that?

Yes, and this is what our Studio packages are built for. Instead of piecing together a freelance designer, a marketing agency, a developer, and a hosting account, you get all of it from one team on one monthly fee:

  • Studio Lite — £1,350/month. SEO retainer + GBP management + WP Care + 6 hours/month of design, dev or content time.
  • Studio Standard — £2,495/month. Bigger SEO scope, 13 hours/month design + dev, quarterly brand reviews.
  • Studio Pro — £3,850/month. The whole stack — 18 hours/month of flex time, weekly GBP posts, monthly cross-discipline strategy session.

Studio is best for businesses who'd otherwise hire a junior designer plus a part-time marketer. It's also how we work with most of our long-standing clients — they like having one point of contact for the whole digital side.

Do you offer ongoing maintenance after launch?

Yes — four WP Care plans, £59–£259/month, covering plugin and core updates, daily backups, security and performance monitoring, and content tweaks. Most clients pair their build with at least our Essentials plan so the site stays healthy and up to date.

See all FAQs →